ব্লগ-টগ

প্রকাশ্যে আত্মপ্রকাশের ঘরোয়া সূত্র

Post Page Advertisement [Top]

To Place your advertisement here call - +917980316633/+918145704098


I was born in rain and I will die in rain. Know me as river, as harbour. They will say I was a slut with a brazen sailor’s mouth. They will not remember my elegance and restraint. They will say they looked in my eyes and counted one hundred forty-six pelicans flying in a wavering line into a marina at sunset ... I resist the obvious borders. For this heresy, I have been categorically penalized. Did you know they sealed me into a cast for one entire year? It was a premature burial where I kept breathing under dirt. They did this repeatedly, gathered my crushed bones like wild-flowers and used plaster as a vase. They sought to make an object of me. There was no composition. It was vandalism.
Kate Braverman, The Incantation of Frida K.

These days, we tend to hear a lot about the term 'Feminism'. We tend to complain a lot too. About its meanings, purposes, and manifestations. Time and again, we have seen the fleeting appropriations of 'phantom feminism' and the unchartered, fragile bulge of female voices that fall short of the 'feminist' tone. Or sometimes, it is the other way around: A 'being' of feminism is imposed, overlooking everything that qualifies for patriarchy. Maybe, it is our short-term, compartmentalized conception of feminism. Equal pay, equal rights, equal status—terms that more than half of the female population in the world, consciously or unconsciously, find unrelatable. Then why do we, the women, employ such a term to represent the status of our beings when the term itself is inadequate to represent us all?

In this net, it’s not just the strings that count But also the air that escapes through the meshes. 
- Pablo Neruda

In the recent times, we have seen varying degrees of feminism. And this is where Frida Kahlo's feminism steps in. Most of the books and articles on her that I have come across dub her as a feminist icon, crowned in the hearts of marginalized groups. And in a way, she is deserving of the praise. The dense, singular eyebrows, the faint moustache, the colourful attires that bespoke mexicanidad, the bold strokes of her artistic brushes, and an even bolder promiscuous lifestyle have conspired together posthumously to create a mythical Frida beyond the confines of human destiny. Sadly, however, this construction falls in the dents of misinterpretations and masquerades. Frida lived in the Rhetoric, nearly feminist, nearly liberated, nearly replete in her mission. And like all her paintings, her life had been short of that one brush stroke of completion. It was beautifully unfinished!

There have been two great accidents in my life. One was the trolley, and the other was Diego. Diego was by far the worst. 
- Frida Kahlo

Tragedy has been more faithful a consort to Frida than Diego Rivera. The sheer frequency of her tragedies contributed to her heroic reputation; she is seen as someone who rose above the physical and psychogenic pain to paint the somatic. She fiercely and dramatically portrayed reality, appearing neither attached nor detached of the misfortunes that shaped her artistic imagination in the first place. Yet, the same countenances of vulnerability is a bid towards the invulnerable. For instance, 'Herrera evaluates Kahlo's entire oeuvre and her late-twentieth-century popularity in terms of bipolarities subsumed within the overarching battle between surrendering to pain and struggling for survival':

There is the tension created by Kahlo's festive, be-costumed exterior and her anguished interior. There is a split between her mask of control and the turmoil that thrashed inside her head. Even as she presented herself as a heroine, she insisted that we know her vulnerability. And while she was compelled to see herself and to be truly seen, she hid behind the mythic creature she invented to help her withstand life's blows . . . . [H]er self-portraits . . . were not just a means to communicate feeling, but a device to keep feeling in check. Thus while her paintings draw us into her power, they also frustrate. They are steely in their distance and obdurate in their silence . . . forc[ing] us to come face to face with Frida . . . and . . . with unexplored parts of ourselves. [Taken from Margaret A. Lindauer, Devouring Frida: The Art History and Popular Celebrity of Frida Kahlo]

Isn't this an expression of submission to her fate? Not only her paintings, but also her temperaments betrayed a certain submission. Her and her husband's affairs, her dutiful marriages, multiple abortions, her exhibited political leanings that uncannily dawdled behind her husband's are repeatedly sheeted by her involvement in 'marginalized' issues. Her virile behaviour was characterized by an obsessive promiscuity and unfailing flirtiousness. She once said, 'I paint my own reality. The only thing I know is that I paint because I need to, and I paint whatever passes through my head without any other consideration.' In fact, her self-portraits portrayed a Frida interacting with herself as a consequence triggered by her interaction with the men in her lives. To name one of her famous paintings, her 1932 Henry Ford Hospital was inspired by a life-threatening abortion. 'The painting is considered to illustrate the artist's mourning for her aborted child and despair over her apparent physical inability to carry a child to term. This one-to-one association of life events to the meaning of a painting follows the paradigmatic art history model described by Mieke Bal and Norman Bryson', the 'purpose of art-historical narration is to merge the authorized corpus and its producer into a single entity, the totalized narrative of the-man-and-his-work, in which the rhetorical figure author=corpus governs the narration down to its finest details'.

Frida's 'feminism' was conditional, operating within the confines of Mexican patriarchy. She had incessantly employed a rhetorical attitude towards her ideologies, surging and backtracking at the same time. One goes on to doubt the honesty of her convictions but never their execution. Indeed, still today, she remains the celebrated and confident embodiment of mortal chaos, above human sensibilities, in every way living in the field beyond rightdoing and wrongdoing. In life. And after life.

But, sorry! Frida Kahlo was no Feminist.




No comments:

Post a Comment

Bottom Ad [Post Page]

To Place your advertisement here call - +917980316633/+918145704098